|

|
The New Uncanny (Tales of
Unease)
Edited by Sarah Eyre & Ra Page
Comma Press
2008
Paperback
Winner:2008 Shirley Jackson Award for Best Anthology
|
|
"The
uncanny destabilises the reality of who one is, and what one is
experiencing. It disturbs any straightforward sense of what is within
and what is without, and alerts us to the foreign body within us. Or
worse, makes us regard ourselves as a foreign body, a stranger."
Reviewed by Steve Wasserman
There is no royal road to the unconscious, and by extension, the
uncanny. Only leaf-obscured footpaths, mud-bogged bridleways, the odd
permissive thoroughfare, and more cul-de-sacs than you can shake a
Dream Dictionary at. So it is not surprising that the strongest sense
of Das Unheimliche (literally: the "unhomely") came for me not at the
point of reading this collection in which modern-day writers are asked
to utilize Freud's recipes for Anxiety-Inducing Kreplach in their own
short stories, but in rather the warm, homely, post-spooked aftermath
of the event.
Impressed
by Ra Page's astute and beautifully written introduction, I thought I'd
track down and re-read some of the primary sources: not just Freud's
1919 progenitive essay ("the reason we're all here", Page allusively
reminds us) but also Ernst Jentsch from which Freud borrowed heavily,
as well as E T A Hoffman's short story The Sandman
which the über cross-disciplinarian Freud subjects to a somewhat
clunky analysis, completely missing out on the proto-feminist subtext
(very Freud).
I then see that Nicholas Royle, whose short story The Dummy
is one of my favourites in this collection, had written a whole book on
the subject, and so make my way to the third floor of my university
library to hunt the tome down. Do Royle's talents have no bounds? Five
novels, over a 100 short stories, the ability to read books whilst
perambulating around Manchester without falling over, and now this: a
magisterial work of critical and cultural theory, where the writing is
as good as the ideas expressed therein. I devour the first two
chapters, sitting right there next to the book stacks, and then browse
forward through The Death Drive, Darkness, Buried Alive, until alighting on The Double.
In
this chapter, Royle reveals that he has a doppelganger called Nicholas
Royle. One of these Nicholas Royles appears to be the writer I follow
on Twitter (@nicholasroyle), the other is tweet-autonomous. Both
have written novels about Doubles, both respond to the name Nick, but
only one of them (he is very diligent about pointing this out) has won
the Literary Review's Bad Sex in Fiction award. Occasionally NR (1957)
emails NR (1963) to discuss the comedy of errors that has befallen one
or the other. They sometimes do readings together.
It is at
this moment that Das Unheimliche, draws an icy finger down the back of
my neck. Is this some kind of PoMo joke, I wonder? I look around, as if
expecting to see our pop purveyor of the uncanny, Derren Brown,
skipping out from behind a shelf of literary criticism in order to
reveal that I'd been hypnotised by him into believing I was writing a
review about a book which doesn't really exist. "Oh, and if you look
down, Steve, you will also discover that you aren't wearing any
trousers."
This ability to completely derange the neat and often
wholly illusory certainties of the Self is what makes the uncanny such
a delicious and fascinating literary and extra-literary phenomenon.
Like much great fiction, it is deeply and quite often deviously
liminal: existing at that point where the unfamiliar shades into
something uncannily familiar, or as Freud put it "developing in the
direction of ambivalence, until it finally coincides with its opposite".
The
first jolt of the uncanny in Hoffman's tale occurs as the young
Nathaniel peeks out from behind some curtains at his father and the
demonic Coppelius throwing aside their dressing gowns to reveal "long
black frocks". What follows are even stranger exertions around another
"black cavity", but it's this initial transition from heimlich to
unheimlich that really sets the reader's alarm bell's ringing.
Similarly, on the first page of NR-1963's story The Dummy,
his narrator, a writer interested in Belgium, and thus already an
uncanny version of Royle himself, spots (or perhaps hits?) a motorway
maintenance worker in high-visibility clothing. It takes one sentence
towards the bottom of the page for Royle to pitch us straight into the
uncanny ("The planes of his face seem abnormally severe, his skin
unnaturally smooth"). But then, as Hoffman also does, he immediately
return us to the "homely" ("Do motorway maintenance workers really
shave every morning?"). We feel (almost) "safe", and settle comfortably
into further sensual homeliness/canniness: in this case, extra-marital
sex with a Belgian journalist. And then he pulls the rug out from under
our feet once more.
This see-sawing towards, away, and then back
again into the uncanny is further intensified by swapping back and
forth between first and second person narrators, enabling Royle to
carry off an incredibly sophisticated maneuver whereby the reader
experiences the very splitting-off of the psyche that narrator has to
achieve in order to commit a heinous act later on in the tale.
This "other" that speaks of "you" is perhaps The Dummy's voice
or possibly even NR-1957's voice. The frisson that goes with the
reading and re-reading of this story, and others that achieve this
delicate balance, is that character motivation is almost wholly
obscured. But it feels right not to know. There is no Royle road to the
unconscious.
Those stories that are less disturbing are perhaps
the ones that attempt to join the dots, trying to explain away the
uncanny by making it a post-mortem or post-dump-em event: someone's
died, your lover's left you, hello uncanny my old friend. The
logic of the uncanny though is like that of a dream: "meaningful but
inconsistent, senseless on the surface, but pointing toward a deeper
unconscious order" (Eva-Maria Simms). Like dreams, and sometimes like
life, the uncanny is cruel and senseless for no (apparent) reason. A.S
Byatt's Doll's Eyes leaves
you struggling for breath with its final paragraph, enraged by the
folly of human transaction. Sara Maitland's Ultra-Grimm fable Seeing Double holds
no prisoners either. The uncanny works as a "reading effect", the other
Nicholas Royle (1957) reminds us: allowing brief, unsettling access
into our shared Pandora's box of human sexuality, aggression, and
loneliness, "it's not simply in the text as a theme".
In a way
then, any great short story should be stuffed to the gills with
"uncanny startlement" as Harold Bloom puts it, anointing the literature
he calls canonical: "a strangeness, a mode of originality that either
cannot be assimilated, or that so assimilates us that we cease to see
it as strange". Nevertheless, I welcome the stories in this volume that
allow us to be dreamed by them, those transitional objects between
abject terror and sweet asylum.
Read an excerpt from one of the stories in this anthology on AdamMarek.co.uk
You can download a story by Nicholas Royle at Solaris Read E T A Hoffman's The Sandman here. Read Freud's essay on The Uncanny here.
|
|
Steve Wasserman is a psychotherapist
and mindfulness trainer living in London. He also teaches Mindfulness
Based Writing with Dr Kerry Ryan.
|
|
|
|
|
home
about
find something to read: reviews
find something to read: interviews
find something to read: categories
find something to
read: back
issues
blog
competitions &
giveaways
links
|
Editors Sarah Eyre is Co-Founder of Comma Press, Photographer, Curator, and Former Sales Officer at Carcanet Press.
Ra Page is Co-Founder of Comma Press and General Editor
Authors A.S. Byatt, Christopher Priest, Ramsey Campbell, Etgar Keret, Hanif
Kureishi, Sara Maitland, Alison MacLeod, Jane Rogers, Gerard Woodward,
Frank Cottrell Boyce, Nicholas Royle, Ian Duhig, Matthew Holness, and
Adam Marek.
|
|