|

|
Mr Fox
by Helen Oyeyemi
Picador, 2011
First
Collection
Awards: Story in this collection, My daughter the racist, shortlisted, 2010 BBC National Short Story Award
|
|
"The
girl decided that she had to hide her heart somewhere until she was
big enough to keep hold of its weight. One night the dead helped her,
some stroking her hair and soothing her while others hooked their
fingers into her and carefully lifted a strand of steam from her
chest."
Reviewed by Tessa Mellas
Helen Oyeyemi’s 2011 release Mr Fox
is both a love serenade to the art of fiction and an
interrogation of writing. It’s a novel interspersed with short stories,
making identification of genre a bit tricky, but who really cares about
labels when you’ve got Oyeyemi spinning magic in
sorcerous ways. The book is fabulism. It’s realism. It’s damsels
suffering beheadings. It’s damsels taking back their heads. It’s a
labyrinthine narrative play space. It’s metafictional, intertextual,
postmodernist, feminist, yet not overly cerebral. Bluebeard pops in and
out in various guises. Foxes recover their former fairytale glory.
Characters romp through a few centuries of narrative genres,
over three continents, in wartime, peacetime, New York City, London, an
old-world minaret-laden village, a Yoruban graveyard, and leave off at
the edge of a mythic forest with fated inter-species
love.
A summary of such
craziness will likely sound trite, but it’s compulsory, so here
goes. The book opens in the 1930s in Mr Fox’s study. St. John Fox
is an American writer, that old monolithic masculine type. His
longtime imaginary muse, Mary Foxe, absent six or so years, pays him
a visit. While he swoons over her British accent and professes his
love—with his wife just upstairs mind you—Mary berates him for
his habit of offing his female characters. She calls him a villain, a
serial killer, and says he must change. He confesses he’ll do
anything to have her. So she sends him through a narrative gauntlet,
setting in motion a game in which St. John and Mary enter the space
of the story, becoming characters, pushing and pulling at plots (the
Bluebeard tale gets numerous rounds) trying to alter each other’s
aesthetics. Meanwhile, the novel chapters are set in “the real
world,” where Mr Fox’s wife Daphne, a society type, frets over
the fact that her husband holes himself away and seems to have fallen
for a sleaze he made up in his head.
Oyeyemi picks up where
Angela Carter left off in The Bloody Chamber, taking on the
bloodthirsty Bluebeard figure and his alternate egos, but pushing the
story further, spinning it over and over again. Oyeyemi traces the
tale’s evolution through three key variations— "Bluebeard", "Fitcher’s Bird", and "Mr Fox"—as though attempting to
get to its narrative root in order to prove something important about
narrative, gender, and love. What Oyeyemi is trying to say, though,
is less clear than the book’s many allusions.
She takes up questions
of reader-response theory: Who creates the text? Who has
authority? Can there ever be an authentic original utterance? She
takes up questions about love: What is ideal love? Does love ever
endure past the fairy tale ending? Must a person erase all their past
loves to be true to the present one? She takes up questions about
writing and the nature of stories: Is the writing life torture or
the most ultimate source of bliss? What is the responsibility of the
author in influencing human action and interaction? How do
narratives affect gender roles, relationships, the nature of
marriage? In moving from questions to answers, Mary’s words are
key.
In the first chapter,
Mr Fox tells her, "It’s ridiculous to be so sensitive about the
content of fiction. It’s not real. I mean, come on. It’s all just
a lot of games". But Mary doesn’t buy it. She tells him, "You’ll always refuse to see—or refuse to admit—that what
you’re doing is building a world… What you’re doing is
building a horrible kind of logic… You’re explaining things
that can’t be defended, and the explanations themselves are mad …"
Oyeyemi seems to take
umbrage with the way some men depict women on the page. She reminds
readers that fiction does has consequences, that narrative is at the
root of humanness, giving us meaning, morals, a map. Additionally,
she seems to problematize the idea of the male writer as master,
monolith, top-dog genius in contrast to what sometimes is regarded as
second-tier womanly fluff. Perhaps,
here Oyeyemi joins the likes of Cynthia Ozick and Julianna Baggott,
throwing in her two cents in the argument that women writers are
often overlooked, the scale repetitively tipped towards men, sliding
publications, prizes, and accolades more frequently their way.
Ultimately Oyeyemi
takes the pen out of Mr Fox’s hand and has his muse Mary give women
back a room of their own. In one of the stories within the novel,
hide, seek, a woman called Blue hands a woman called Brown
twelve fountain pens, points her to a room, and tells her to write.
When Brown stalls, her dead Yoruban ancestors visit. Bluebeard also
visits in the variation of Reynardine. They all tell her to write,
and in doing so, Brown recovers something she lost.
At the end of the
novel, Mary seems to abandon her post as St. John’s muse altogether
and switches over to his wife’s side. Mary suggests that Daphne
write a book herself. For the first time, Daphne comes to see
that she can be more than a submissive society wife. In promising
Mary a book, she titles her future work Hedda Gabler and Other
Monsters. It is only with this shift that the spark in St. John
and Daphne’s marriage seems to return.
Of course, if Oyeyemi
is making a case for female writers, it is her own writing that
serves as the best evidence of a female writer’s worth. Page by
page, Oyeyemi is brilliant, and the book gains strength as it goes.
As the book evolves and Mary Foxe takes greater control of the
narrative, the writing changes. In its initial most masculine form,
Mr Fox’s stories are plot-driven and violent. The women die, and
the men move on to new wives: classic Bluebeard. But as Mary takes
over the telling, the style becomes more feminine, not in a
stereotypically romantic, gushy, domestic way. Rather, the narratives
seem to recede back in time to a less citified manhandled landscape,
where nature and animals reoccupy a place of importance, where
mysticism takes the place of reason and logic. Meanwhile, the prose
becomes more beautiful, more mythic, more primal.
Take this
female-narrated sentence midway through the book:
I wondered
whether within each ant there is another and another and another
until finally you reached a cold small chip of the universe,
immovable and displeased. Or this one a bit further on:
Even from the narrow side-streets where damp sand beads and
breathes, any window can tell you why they say here the world began
with a brother and sister locked in a beautiful circus trick. Or this:
The girl decided that she had to hide her heart
somewhere until she was big enough to keep hold of its weight. One
night the dead helped her, some stroking her hair and soothing her
while others hooked their fingers into her and carefully lifted a
strand of steam from her chest.
Oyeyemi’s luscious
breathtaking prose, her talent for holding readers captive with a
mighty good yarn, her ability to weave magic, vitality, relevance out
of an old fairy tale that seemed long ago to have been used up—all
this shows that this very skilled, very young writer, has serious
literary chops. Mr Fox is entertaining, smart, and gorgeous.
Whether this year’s prize committees give the big trophies to the
Mr Foxes or the Daphnes is yet to be said, but regardless, Helen
Oyeyemi’s reputation as one of this decade’s biggest literary
talents is safely assured.
|
|
Tessa Mellas
is a
PhD student at the University of Cincinnati. Her fiction appears or
is forthcoming in StoryQuarterly, Hayden’s Ferry Review, Gulf
Coast, Fugue, New Orleans Review, Pank, and Washington Square
Review. Her book reviews have appeared in Mid-American Review,
New Pages, Sycamore Review, and The Short Review.
|
|
|
|
|
|