|
Master of Sweet Dreams: Laboratory Fairy Tales
by Andrew Ivortow
Troubador
2010
Paperback
|
|
"I became familiar with the music of the brain. I learned
the murmurs the brain produced when my boy was playing happily on the
street. I was in his brain when he was fighting with other children –
sometimes winning, sometimes losing. I was in his brain when his pet
rabbit died. I learned the buzzes of an angry brain and the whispers of a
saddened brain."
Reviewed by Tania Hershman
A book subtitled "Laboratory Fairy Tales" and which claims in its back
cover blurb to be about "the life, death and afterlife of scientists...
the drives, ambitions and pains that shape a scientist's existence" is
immediately intriguing to me. And to add to this, I google the author
and discover that Andrew Ivortow is the pen name for a "Professor of
Physiology in a distinguished British University". Why does he feel the
need to hide his identity, I wonder to myself? Is he going to reveal the
dark secrets of lab life to the uninitiated? I begin to read.
There are nine "tales" in this very slim self-published volume,
ranging in length from one page to a hefty eighteen. Ivortow seems to
want to share lab life with non-laboratory dwellers but also includes
his fair share of in-jokes that non-scientists like myself could find
somewhat puzzling. The first tale, The Instrument, is a
combination of these – the story of Mark, a researcher who actually
lives in his lab. And here comes the in-joke: "Mark was in the prime of
his research powers – strong, energetic and very good looking – the age
when scientists make their discoveries and long before the time when
bald, decrepit and worn out researchers receive prestigious prizes and
are finally revealed to the general public."
The premise of this story is a fascinating one: Mark is given a
Christmas present by a creature who appears in his lab, a box which can
become any scientific instrument he would like it to be. However, no
sooner has the reader's appetite been whetted by this do we move away
from Mark to the "creature" who gave the gift, and then the story ends.
It's a shame the author didn't carry on writing; this is a great idea to
explore, to learn more about Mark and how this gift affects his "drives, ambitions and pains".
The second tale, the one-page long Four Ages of a Scientist,
came across to me as nothing more than an in-joke, albeit one that
raised a chuckle as it took a dig at mathematics, theoretical physics
and systems biology. The stories Application for Research Funding
(Grant application), Heaven and Hell for Scientists and The Mind of an
Achiever left me feeling similarly, I'm afraid.
The title story Master of Sweet Dreams grabs the reader's
attention immediately with the first line: "I died recently (two
centuries ago)." This is another lovely premise, as the main character
is reincarnated as a kind of spirit who enters the mind of a small boy:
I became familiar with the music of the brain. I learned
the murmurs the brain produced when my boy was playing happily on the
street. I was in his brain when he was fighting with other children –
sometimes winning, sometimes losing. I was in his brain when his pet
rabbit died. I learned the buzzes of an angry brain and the whispers of a
saddened brain.
Beautiful writing here, very evocative. This character stays with the
young boy through his adulthood to his death, then skips into other
brains and into that of a poet, where he begins to learn "to conduct the
human brain", playing a neuron "like a flute" to create brain melodies.
This is a sweet tale but for me it was lacking in the tension
necessary to create a powerful and lasting work of fiction. The main
character, this "Master of sweet dreams", didn't seem to want anything
and so the reader is not compelled to keep reading to find out what
happens. Events unfolded without much contention, much conflict. There
are several places here where this story could have taken that turn,
perhaps staying just with the small boy, or with the poet. We are told
at the beginning that the main character had been a novelist before he
died, but this is never mentioned again, which is a shame!
The Evening in Library (this may be a typo, there are several
in the manuscript, which is also a shame) once again has a very
intriguing premise, of a scientist who has a research associate,
Rebecca, who sings. She is "the laboratory siren... young and sometimes
not very young researchers were drawn to the laboratory by her singing
and many would never be able to come out again". However, this doesn't
seem to have any bearing on the rest of the story. The scientist meets
ghosts from his early lab life in the library, and discovers that he
himself has just died. The older ghosts then proceed to assess his
entire scientific life – and here are more digs at the scientific
community: "On rare occasions, however, they displayed a complex mixture
of envy and delight (a sentiment well known to scientists, indicating
that someone else has produced a masterpiece in their research field)".
However, this story doesn't quite deliver on its promise either.
Rebecca, the lab siren, never reappears, and the story seems to stop
just as it is getting interesting.
Maybe by calling this collection "fairy tales", the author was
signalling to the reader not to hold them up to the same scrutiny as
short stories, that they were just written for fun and shouldn't be
taken as more than that. This is a great pity because here is a
scientist who writes well, who has a fantastic imagination and who wants
to give readers insight into lab life, but has not given himself the
time and space to explore and develop these ideas fully. He might want
to take inspiration from books like Einstein's Dreams by Alan Lightman, for example, or The Solitude of Prime Numbers
by Paolo Giordano, as well as short fiction that has nothing to do with
science but shows just what a short story can do. Perhaps we will hear
from "Andrew Ivortow" again in the future. I do hope so.
(This review was first published in LabLit)
|