|

|

WendyPerriam.com
Wendy Perriam
is an English novelist and
graduate of the University
of Oxford who wrote her first novel at eleven.
She has had sixteen novels published and seven short story collections.
Her work has received critical acclaim and she has been described as "a
writer
of
authority
and
skill,
with
a
wicked
ear
for
conversational
quirks"
by
The
Sunday
Times.
In 2002, she won the Literary Review's Bad Sex Award for Tread
softly.
|
|
Short
Story Collections

The Queen's Margarine
(Robert Hale, 2009)
reviewed
by Angela Readman

I'm On The Train (2012)

Little Marvel (2008)

The Biggest Female In The World (2007)

Laughter Class
(2006)

Virgin In The Gym
(2004)

Dreams, Demons and Desire (2001)
|
|
Interview
with Wendy Perriam
The
Short Review:
How long did it take you to write all the stories in your collection?
Wendy Perriam: It took about a year. I often write the first draft of each story very quickly, but then I like to
revise and polish it. However, a short-story collection never takes as long as a novel, because,
with novels, there’s much more planning and structuring involved and often a lot of research,
too.
TSR:
Did you
have a collection in mind when you were writing them?
WP: Yes, I had a contract from my publisher, so, right from the start, I knew I was producing a
collection. I think this is more satisfying, partly because individual stories are often difficult to
sell. The good old days of numerous outlets for short stories are, sadly, gone. In the past, I used
to write short stories for magazines such as Cosmopolitan, She, Honey and Good Housekeeping.
TSR:
How did
you choose which stories to include and in what order?
WP: I didn’t have to choose which ones to include, because they were all written specifically for
this collection. However, I spent ages trying to decide on the order. Obviously, I prefer to start
with what I judge to be one of the strongest stories, but I try to avoid a really downbeat one, or
one with an unsympathetic character. I also give some thought to the last story in the book, as I
like to end the book with a definite cadence, as in music. As for the ones in between, I’ll try to
balance longer ones with shorter; downbeat ones with upbeat; stories featuring elderly people
with those featuring younger ones. I’ll even consider the season in which the story is set and
try to alternate those that take place in winter with those that take place in spring or summer.
So having spent all this time and thought on the matter, I’m always disconcerted to hear from
friends or readers that they just dipped into the book and read the stories in a completely random
order!
TSR:
What
does the word "story"
mean to you?
WP: One of the advantages of the short-story form is that it is highly versatile. It can vary in length
from 500 words to 8,000. David Eggers, for example, has written stories comprising just a
single paragraph, whereas Alice Munro’s The Love of a Good Woman extends to 60 pages. A
short story can have a definite plot and a narrative-arc, or it can just provide a moment of truth,
or change, or revelation. It may be a profound social comment, or little more than a sense-
impression. It can include many characters or just one; encompass various different settings, or
be restricted to one place.
However, the essence of a short story, as I see it, is compression and concision. Sub-plots, or
long descriptions or analyses of either characters or settings don’t work well in short stories.
The novel-form thrives on elaboration and expansion, but the short-story form is more about
economy and distillation, and can perhaps be seen as standing halfway between the novel and
poetry. Another important constituent, in my view, is a certain ambiguity. A short story does not
need to be fully resolved; instead, certain questions can be left unanswered, to resonate in the
reader’s mind.
TSR:
Do you have a reader in mind when you write stories?
WP: Much as I love to have readers – and, indeed, I’m extremely grateful to them for spending time
and trouble reading what I’ve written – I don’t have them in mind when planning or writing
the stories. I feel this would inhibit me, in that I’d try too hard to please them, or maybe avoid
difficult or depressing subjects, for fear of alienating them. For the same reason, I refuse
to “write for the market” – i.e. choose a fashionable subject that I hope will win me attention
and/or sales. Instead, I follow my gut-instinct and my personal obsessions; many of which
spring from childhood. The theme that haunts me most is the conflict between duty, obedience,
self-denial and submission, on the one hand, and hedonism, rebellion, and breaking free of
confines and convention, on the other. This stems from the fact that I was born a naturally wild
and unconventional child to a very strict Roman Catholic family, with great stress on discipline
and "proper" behavior. And, when I was sent to a convent boarding school, the pressures to be
good and to deny oneself for God increased substantially. So I struggled to be what I wasn’t –
to adopt the role model of the Virgin Mary, when I was, by temperament, very far from being
meek, submissive and unquestioning!
TSR: Is
there
anything you'd like to ask someone who has read your collection, anything at all?
WP: Several of the stories in this collection are sad or downbeat, or feature neurotic characters. I
suppose this is because I have quite a bleak view of the world, and I suspect that many of us are
far more disturbed or fearful than the "happy" image we project. But I’d like to ask my readers
whether they agree with this view or not. And do they find the sad stories off-putting, and prefer
the upbeat and more "normal" ones such as High Speed 2 or Tulips?
TSR: How does
it feel knowing that people are buying your book?
WP: It’s a wonderful feeling and I’m always deeply honored if people buy my books. It’s profoundly
satisfying to know that someone is willing to spend time and money reading what I have written.
In fact, I’d go so far as to say that a book is dead without readers. Readers bring it alive and
bring their own imagination, insights and experience to flesh out what I’ve put on the page. This
interaction between writer and reader is, to me, absolutely crucial. A perceptive reader can often
see things in the work that I myself failed to see, or interpret it in a deeper way.
TSR:
What are you working on now?
WP: A novel about three generations of women. I don’t want to say too much about it at this stage,
as a work-in-progress is rather a fragile and uncertain thing. As I work on it from day to day, or
month to month, I often encounter problems and have to change direction or incorporate new
elements so I prefer to keep it fairly private until it reaches its final form.
However, my next short-story collection, I’m on the train! is finished and due to be published
in April 2012. The title-story was sparked by a garrulous woman beside me, endlessly chatting
on her mobile, when I was travelling by train to my cousin’s funeral. I also wrote a story based
on the funeral itself. Short stories often arise from real-life events, or from such tiny incidents as
the phone-pest, but I then change and develop them into something very different.
TSR:
What are
the three most recent short story collections you've read?
|
|
|